On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 21:45 +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 02.10.2013, 21:30 +0200 schrieb Jan Luebbe: > > The function am33xx_get_cpu_rev may be called before barebox_arm_entry(), > > so we need to avoid switch statements. > > Uhm, could you please be more verbose on _why_ we need to avoid switch > statements at this stage? I might be running into the same failure with > Tegra at some point if there's a real issue.
I believe the problem is that the table is accessed using absolute addresses. Before the call to barebox_arm_entry() barebox may be running at a different address. Regards, Jan _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
