On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 08:31:44AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 08:58:23PM +0100, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-omap/omap4_clock.c | 176
> > +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap/omap4_clock.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-omap/omap4_clock.c
> > index 268f7c1..72f72a1 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap/omap4_clock.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap/omap4_clock.c
> > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void omap4_configure_per_dpll(const struct dpll_param
> > *dpll_param)
> > void omap4_configure_abe_dpll(const struct dpll_param *dpll_param)
> > {
> > /* Select sys_clk as ref clk for ABE dpll */
> > - writel(CM_ABE_PLL_REF_CLKSEL, 0x0);
> > + writel(0x0, CM_ABE_PLL_REF_CLKSEL);
>
> What a silly bug! Who messed this up? Damn. me :(. Applied both, thanks
>
Yea, I will put this on my list what I should ever check on patches with
writel. :-)
- Alex
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
