Hi,

there are only some little nitpicks... maybe not important.

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 07:06:43PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 
wrote:
> This will allow to do not check in each board which machine we are running
> from. This work on DT & non-DT board.
> 
> If only one board is enable autoselect it
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/Makefile              |   2 +-
>  arch/arm/cpu/dtb.c                 |   8 +-
>  arch/arm/cpu/machine.c             | 188 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h |   8 ++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h   |  68 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/lib/barebox.lds.S         |   6 ++
>  6 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/machine.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/Makefile
> index aba201b..78532da 100644
...
> +
> +int is_dt_compatible(const struct machine_desc *m, const char* dt_compat)
> +{
> +     const char *const *dtc = m->dt_compat;
const char *const *dtc? Looks like c ninja coding style :-D.

I think you mean:

const char **dtc = ...

> +
> +     while (dtc) {
> +             const char *s = *dtc;
> +             if (dt_compat && !of_compat_cmp(s, dt_compat, 
> strlen(dt_compat)))
> +                     return 1;
> +             else if (of_machine_is_compatible(s))
> +                     return 1;
> +             dtc++;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int arm_set_dt_machine(const char* dt_compat)
> +{
> +     const struct machine_desc *m;
> +
> +     for_each_machine_desc(m) {
> +             if (!is_dt_compatible(m, dt_compat))
> +                     continue;
> +
> +             machine_desc = (const struct machine_desc *)m;
> +             if (m->nr != ~0)
> +                     armlinux_set_architecture(m->nr);
> +
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +
> +     return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_mach_only_one_machine(void)
> +{
> +     const struct machine_desc *m;
> +     const struct machine_desc *tmp = NULL;
> +
> +     for_each_machine_desc(m) {
> +             if (tmp)
> +                     return;
> +             tmp = m;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (!tmp)
> +             return;
> +     machine_desc = (const struct machine_desc *)tmp;
> +     armlinux_set_architecture(machine_desc->nr);
> +}
> +
> +#define arm_mach_xx_init(level)                                              
> \
> +({                                                                   \
> +     int __ret = 0;                                                  \
> +                                                                     \
> +     do {                                                            \
> +             if (!machine_desc)                                      \
> +                     break;                                          \
> +                                                                     \
> +             if (machine_desc->level##_init) {                       \
> +                     __ret = machine_desc->level##_init();           \
> +                     if (__ret)                                      \
> +                             break;                                  \
> +             }                                                       \
> +     } while(0);                                                     \
> +     __ret;                                                          \
> +})
> +
> +static int arm_mach_pure_init(void)
> +{
> +     int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +     if (__machine_arch_type != ~0 && __machine_arch_type < MAX_MACH_TYPE)
> +             ret = arm_set_machine(__machine_arch_type);
> +     if (ret)
> +             arm_mach_only_one_machine();
> +     of_arm_init();
> +
> +     ret = arm_mach_xx_init(pure);
> +
> +     return ret;
unnecessary assignment to ret.

- Alex

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to