Was tested on NAND with {writesize=4096, oobsize=224} and
{writesize=2048, oobsize=64}.

This patch will not break any NAND that was working
before. Implemented calculation way may be used for other NAND chips
with writesize == 2048 but oobsize != 64.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Lavnikevich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Grigory Milev <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
index 237a423..b06b558 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_mxs.c
@@ -234,18 +234,31 @@ static uint32_t mxs_nand_aux_status_offset(void)
 static inline uint32_t mxs_nand_get_ecc_strength(uint32_t page_data_size,
                                                uint32_t page_oob_size)
 {
+       int ecc_chunk_count = mxs_nand_ecc_chunk_cnt(page_data_size);
+       int ecc_strength = 0;
+       int gf_len = 13;  /* length of Galois Field for non-DDR nand */
+
+       /*
+        * Possibly this if-else calculation may be removed since
+        * ecc_strength calculated after it is taken from kernel driver
+        * and therefore should work for all cases. But it was tested only
+        * on devices with {data_size = 2046, oob_size = 64} and
+        * {data_size = 4096, oob_size = 224} configuration.
+        */
        if (page_data_size == 2048)
                return 8;
-
-       if (page_data_size == 4096) {
+       else if (page_data_size == 4096) {
                if (page_oob_size == 128)
                        return 8;
-
                if (page_oob_size == 218)
                        return 16;
        }
 -      return 0;
+       ecc_strength = ((page_oob_size - MXS_NAND_METADATA_SIZE) * 8)
+               / (gf_len * ecc_chunk_count);
+
+       /* We need the minor even number. */
+       return rounddown(ecc_strength, 2);
 }
  static inline uint32_t mxs_nand_get_mark_offset(uint32_t page_data_size,
--
1.8.5.1


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to