On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:32:03AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Christoph Fritz <[email protected]>
> 
> This patch adds phy status checks on cpsw_send() and cpsw_recv().
> This is derived from upstream.

What's the motivation for this? We already call phy_update_status every
5 seconds which then calls phy_device->adjust_link. Isn't this enough?

Sascha

> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Fritz <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/cpsw.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/cpsw.c
> index ec3263d..9e7b320 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/cpsw.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ struct cpsw_priv {
>       struct cpdma_chan               rx_chan, tx_chan;
>  
>       struct cpsw_slave               *slaves;
> +
> +     u32                             mdio_link;
> +     u32                             phy_mask;
>  };
>  
>  static int cpsw_ale_get_field(u32 *ale_entry, u32 start, u32 bits)
> @@ -608,14 +611,28 @@ static void cpsw_slave_update_link(struct cpsw_slave 
> *slave,
>  static int cpsw_update_link(struct cpsw_slave *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv)
>  {
>       int link = 0;
> +     struct cpsw_mdio_regs *mdio_regs = priv->mdio_regs;
>  
>       dev_dbg(priv->dev, "* %s\n", __func__);
>  
>       cpsw_slave_update_link(slave, priv, &link);
>  
> +     priv->mdio_link = readl(&mdio_regs->link);
>       return link;
>  }
>  
> +static int cpsw_check_link(struct cpsw_priv *priv)
> +{
> +     u32 link = 0;
> +     struct cpsw_mdio_regs *mdio_regs = priv->mdio_regs;
> +
> +     link = readl(&mdio_regs->link) & priv->phy_mask;
> +     if ((link) && (link == priv->mdio_link))
> +             return 1;
> +
> +     return cpsw_update_link(&priv->slaves[0], priv);
> +}
> +
>  static void cpsw_adjust_link(struct eth_device *edev)
>  {
>       struct cpsw_slave *slave = edev->priv;
> @@ -657,6 +674,8 @@ static void cpsw_slave_init(struct cpsw_slave *slave, 
> struct cpsw_priv *priv)
>  
>       /* add broadcast address */
>       cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv, ethbdaddr, 1 << slave_port);
> +
> +     priv->phy_mask |= 1 << slave->phy_id;
>  }
>  
>  static struct cpdma_desc *cpdma_desc_alloc(struct cpsw_priv *priv)
> @@ -874,6 +893,9 @@ static int cpsw_send(struct eth_device *edev, void 
> *packet, int length)
>  
>       dev_dbg(priv->dev, "* %s\n", __func__);
>  
> +     if (!cpsw_check_link(priv))
> +             return -EIO;
> +
>       /* first reap completed packets */
>       while (cpdma_process(priv, &priv->tx_chan, &buffer, &len) >= 0);
>  
> @@ -893,6 +915,8 @@ static int cpsw_recv(struct eth_device *edev)
>       void *buffer;
>       int len;
>  
> +     cpsw_check_link(priv);
> +
>       while (cpdma_process(priv, &priv->rx_chan, &buffer, &len) >= 0) {
>               dma_inv_range((ulong)buffer, (ulong)buffer + len);
>               net_receive(buffer, len);
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to