On Jun 6, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Antony Pavlov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 21:48:10 +0200 > Frederik Van Slycken <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2014-06-05 21:36 GMT+02:00 Frederik Van Slycken >> <[email protected]>: >>> 2014-06-05 21:30 GMT+02:00 Robert Schwebel <[email protected]>: >>>> Where is that in the wiki? IMHO it isn't correct, the toplevel COPYING >>>> file says v2, which is also our intention. >>> >>> http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php#license >>> >>> """ >>> This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or >>> modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as >>> published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of >>> the License, or (at your option) any later version. >>> """ >> >> A couple of other locations - I'm not sure if they're all up to date, >> but these are results 3 and 4 when I do a google search for "barebox >> license" : >> http://www.barebox.org/documentation/barebox-2011.05.0/ >> http://www.barebox.org/documentation/barebox-2009.12.0/main.html >> >> Number 2 was the wiki, already mentioned, and number 1 is wikipedia, >> which does mention only gplv2 :) > > I think Sascha can clarify this question. > > AFAIR barebox itself is gplv2-only software, but we can add gplv2-or-later > components into it. For a legal point of view we do not care Barebox is GPLv2 ONLY as it does contain quite a lot of file GPLv2 ONLY and yes we DO can add GPLv2+ file into it IIRC we already had this conversation on the ML before with Sascha & I over it and state that Barebox will be GPLv2 Only It’s a statement for company that invest in Barebox that tomorrow the licence will not evolve So they can have longterm plan with it (legal point of view) Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
