On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 02:17:09PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Move to the common streaming DMA ops in order to get rid of
> the direct usage of the ARM MMU functions for the cache
> maintenance.
Tested-by: Jan Weitzel <[email protected]>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/cpsw.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/cpsw.c
> index 799fac8..3f8ffa0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/cpsw.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  #include <init.h>
>  
>  #include <command.h>
> +#include <dma.h>
>  #include <net.h>
>  #include <malloc.h>
>  #include <net.h>
> @@ -32,7 +33,6 @@
>  #include <of_net.h>
>  #include <of_address.h>
>  #include <xfuncs.h>
> -#include <asm/mmu.h>
>  #include <asm/system.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  
> @@ -871,9 +871,9 @@ static int cpsw_send(struct eth_device *edev, void 
> *packet, int length)
>  
>       dev_dbg(&slave->dev, "%s: %i bytes @ 0x%p\n", __func__, length, packet);
>  
> -     dma_flush_range((ulong) packet, (ulong)packet + length);
> -
> +     dma_sync_single_for_device((unsigned long)packet, length, 
> DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>       ret = cpdma_submit(priv, &priv->tx_chan, packet, length);
> +     dma_sync_single_for_cpu((unsigned long)packet, length, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>  
>       return ret;
>  }
> @@ -886,8 +886,11 @@ static int cpsw_recv(struct eth_device *edev)
>       int len;
>  
>       while (cpdma_process(priv, &priv->rx_chan, &buffer, &len) >= 0) {
> -             dma_inv_range((ulong)buffer, (ulong)buffer + len);
> +             dma_sync_single_for_cpu((unsigned long)buffer, len,
> +                                     DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>               net_receive(edev, buffer, len);
> +             dma_sync_single_for_device((unsigned long)buffer, len,
> +                                        DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>               cpdma_submit(priv, &priv->rx_chan, buffer, PKTSIZE);
>       }
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to