We should print the block number before increasing it, not afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
---
 common/imx-bbu-nand-fcb.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/imx-bbu-nand-fcb.c b/common/imx-bbu-nand-fcb.c
index d2bfedb..5b984d4 100644
--- a/common/imx-bbu-nand-fcb.c
+++ b/common/imx-bbu-nand-fcb.c
@@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ static int imx6_bbu_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd)
        while (len > 0) {
                pr_debug("erasing at 0x%08llx\n", offset);
                if (mtd_block_isbad(mtd, offset)) {
-                       offset += mtd->erasesize;
                        pr_debug("erase skip block @ 0x%08llx\n", offset);
+                       offset += mtd->erasesize;
                        continue;
                }
 
@@ -308,9 +308,9 @@ static int imx6_bbu_write_firmware(struct mtd_info *mtd, 
int block, void *buf, s
                                buf, offset, len);
 
                if (mtd_block_isbad(mtd, offset)) {
+                       pr_debug("write skip block @ 0x%08llx\n", offset);
                        offset += mtd->erasesize;
                        block++;
-                       pr_debug("write skip block @ 0x%08llx\n", offset);
                        continue;
                }
 
-- 
2.1.4


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to