On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:58 PM Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Andrey, > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:53 PM, Andrey Smirnov > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > + pinctrl_fec1_data_tx: fec1datatxgrp { > > + pinmux = < > > + MX8MQ_IOMUXC_ENET_TD3_ENET1_RGMII_TD3 > > + MX8MQ_IOMUXC_ENET_TD2_ENET1_RGMII_TD2 > > + MX8MQ_IOMUXC_ENET_TD1_ENET1_RGMII_TD1 > > + MX8MQ_IOMUXC_ENET_TD0_ENET1_RGMII_TD0 > > + MX8MQ_IOMUXC_ENET_TXC_ENET1_RGMII_TXC > > + MX8MQ_IOMUXC_ENET_TX_CTL_ENET1_RGMII_TX_CTL > > + >; > > + drive-strength = <7>; > > + slew-rate = <3>; > > In the arm linux kernel list it was suggested that the old pinctrl > style (the same we use on mx5/mx6/mx7) should be used instead of this > new generic pinctrl setting. >
Yeah, I think I saw that ML discussion when I was researching this. AFAICT from looking at for-next in Shawn's tree, fsl,imx7ulp-pinctrl.txt is still going to be using "new style" binding, so the code that I wrote is still useful to support that. And once upstream Linux DT i.MX8M code trickles down, it should be pretty trivial to switch to old sytle just by changing .flags. With all that in mind, I'd be inclined to keep code as is unless told to change it by Sascha. Thanks, Andrey Smirnov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
