Hi David, On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:50 AM, David Jander <da...@protonic.nl> wrote: o, it's not just you. Me and other people are with you. >> >> When talking about device tree stability we usually only talk about the >> bindings, not about the structure of the trees. The problem here was >> probably that people weren't aware that this change breaks stuff. > > That's exactly what I also thought. That's in part also why I sent this e-mail > (the committers are in CC and hopefully listening ;-) > Sorry for the spam in that regard.
I was not aware that removing the leading zeroes would cause any problem, sorry. Maybe you could also report this problem to Rob Herring and the devicetree mainling list. Thanks _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox