On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 1:39 AM Lucas Stach <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Andrey, > > Am Freitag, den 29.06.2018, 20:47 -0700 schrieb Andrey Smirnov: > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/arm/dts/imx51-zii-rdu1.dts | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx51-zii-rdu1.dts b/arch/arm/dts/imx51- > > zii-rdu1.dts > > index 7984e5b32..b0e1d0276 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/dts/imx51-zii-rdu1.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx51-zii-rdu1.dts > > @@ -24,6 +24,13 @@ > > device-path = &spinor, "partname:barebox- > > environment"; > > }; > > }; > > + aliases { > > + /* > > + * Aliases to match Linux kernel naming in /dev/ > > + */ > > + main-eeprom = &main_eeprom; > > + dds-eeprom = &dds_eeprom; > > + }; > > In Linux we are using the "zii,eeprom-name" property for this purpose. > Can we use the same in in Barebox, please? I would like to keep the > differences in the two DTs to a minimum. >
That's a good point, I haven't thought about doing that. I'll submit a follow up series to fix that. Thanks, Andrey Smirnov _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
