On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 09:38:25 +0100
Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:27:54PM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> > The patch fixes the following compiler's warning:
> > 
> > In file included from include/common.h:33:0,
> >                  from arch/arm/mach-zynq/zynq.c:18:
> > arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:4:0: warning: "IO_SPACE_LIMIT" redefined
> >  #define IO_SPACE_LIMIT 0
> > 
> > In file included from
> > arch/arm/mach-zynq/zynq.c:17:0:
> > include/asm-generic/io.h:92:0: note: this is the location of the previous 
> > definition
> >  #define IO_SPACE_LIMIT 0xffff
> > 
> > Cc: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumt...@pengutronix.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov <antonynpav...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-zynq/zynq.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/zynq.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/zynq.c
> > index a0a8d0d249..dd8f12c16a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/zynq.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/zynq.c
> > @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
> >   */
> >  
> >  #include <asm/system.h>
> > -#include <asm-generic/io.h>
> 
> asm-generic/io.h shouldn't be included directly, but only from asm/io.h
> if it decides to do so. io.h includes asm/io.h, so this is the one that
> should be included instead.

common.h includes asm/io.h, please see full patch context:

--- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/zynq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/zynq.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
  */
 
 #include <asm/system.h>
-#include <asm-generic/io.h>
 #include <common.h>
 #include <init.h>
 #include <restart.h>


The question is, should we just drop this "#include <asm-generic/io.h>" or
change "#include <asm-generic/io.h>" into "#include <io.h>".

-- 
Best regards,
  Antony Pavlov

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to