Don't report requested regulator (via of_regulator_get()) as
non-existent if said regulator is missing from regulator list. Instead
report it as probe deferral to give other, unprobed, drivers a chance
to resolve this.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smir...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 795dcdb8c1..4ca035ae94 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -227,7 +227,12 @@ static struct regulator_internal *of_regulator_get(struct 
device_d *dev, const c
                }
        }
 
-       ri = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+       /*
+        * It is possible that regulator we are looking for will be
+        * added in future initcalls, so, instead of reporting a
+        * complete failure report probe deferral
+        */
+       ri = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 out:
        free(propname);
 
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to