On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 10:14:12AM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:16:47 +0100
> Ahmad Fatoum <a.fat...@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > This brings many upstream goodies, among them checking for
> > SPDX-License-Identifier entries for newly added source files.
> >
> > For future reference, following barebox changes were applied
> > on top of the version copied from upstream:
> >
> > 4a7f56056d ("scripts: Adapt checkpatch.pl for barebox.")
> > 2671c30c25 ("scripts/checkpatch.pl: don't search for Doxyfile when checking
> > top_of_kernel_tree()")
> > ad3c55fbf2 ("scripts/checkpatch.pl: don't search for CREDITS when checking
> > top_of_kernel_tree()")
> > 13b0f4666d ("checkpatch: don't check TODO file presence")
> >
> > These adjust sub top_of_kernel_tree's @tree_check to eventually contain
> > (
> > "arch", "commands", "common", "COPYING", "defaultenv",
> > "Documentation", "drivers", "fs", "include", "lib",
> > "MAKEALL", "Makefile", "net", "README", "scripts"
> > );
> >
> > 9e809ef431 ("scripts: allow lines longer than 80 cols with printf() in
> > checkpatch")
> >
> > adds an exception for printf, same as printk.
> >
> > The new checkpatch.pl now also depends on some more files:
> > - cleanfile, cleanpatch, spdxcheck.py, spelling.txt: copied over
> > - const_structs.checkpatch: added as empty file for now
> > - get_maintainer.pl: implemented a dummy to keep changes here to a minimum.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fat...@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 4682 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > scripts/cleanfile | 178 ++
> > scripts/cleanpatch | 260 ++
> > scripts/const_structs.checkpatch | 0
> > scripts/get_maintainer.pl | 11 +
> > scripts/spdxcheck.py | 286 ++
> > scripts/spelling.txt | 1344 +++++++++
> > 7 files changed, 6169 insertions(+), 592 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100755 scripts/cleanfile
> > create mode 100755 scripts/cleanpatch
> > create mode 100644 scripts/const_structs.checkpatch
> > create mode 100755 scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> > create mode 100755 scripts/spdxcheck.py
> > create mode 100644 scripts/spelling.txt
> >
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > index 4e17347a8481..48b39fbf962a 100755
> > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> ...
>
> > @@ -1555,13 +2997,9 @@ sub process {
> >
> > my @compats = $rawline =~
> > /\"([a-zA-Z0-9\-\,\.\+_]+)\"/g;
> >
> > - # linux device tree files
> > - my $dt_path = $root . "/dts/Bindings/";
> > + my $dt_path = $root .
> > "/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/";
>
> At the moment it looks like barebox uses both paths ("/dts/Bindings/" and
> "/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/")
> to store dt-related documentation.
>
> The patch is very long and very hard to review.
>
> @Sascha
>
> Can we introduce rules on storing dt-documentation?
>
> It looks like we have some dt documentation duplication, e.g.
>
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/dallas,ds1307.rst
> ./dts/Bindings/rtc/rtc-ds1307.txt
The rule should be that the upstream documentation is in dts/Bindings/.
Only if there are barebox specific additions they should be in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings. Ideally the barebox files should have
the same name as the upstream files, only contain the additions and
refer to the upstream file for the general bindings.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
