Hello Sam,
On 2/4/19 20:01, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Ahmad.
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:18:22PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> The newly added device tree based first stage fails to load the second
>> stage from MMC, which might be in relation to a preceding atmel_mci
>> "command/data timeout" message.
>
> I had similar troubles with MMC on at91sam9263.
> After some digging the fix was simple:
> See 5feabc1e6737742f1cf6a1c41921f68b4dbb5c10 ("arm: at91: fix clock to mci1
> for at91sam9263")
Might be clock related. But if I need to fit drivers into the PBL
as well, device tree in first-stage won't be viable anyway,
so I probably won't look further into this.
>
> Maybe you are hit by something as simple as this?
>
>> +
>> +static const struct devfs_partition sama5d3_xplained_nand0_partitions[] = {
>> + {
>> + .offset = 0x00000,
>> + .size = SZ_256K,
>> + .flags = DEVFS_PARTITION_FIXED,
>> + .name = "at91bootstrap_raw",
>> + .bbname = "at91bootstrap",
>> + },
> Strange partition name now we use barebox as first stage.
Indeed.
>
>
>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/microchip_ksz9477_evb_bootstrap_mmc_defconfig
>
> Naming confuses me.
> Do we stick to the name "first stage" or do we use "bootstrap"?
> For me they are the same, but I get confused when we use both.
For the at91sam9261ek the bootstrap defconfig is the one defining
AT91_BOOTSTRAP, so I figured I should follow suit..
>
>
> Sam
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
