When ramfs fails to allocate more memory then returning -ENOSPC is more appropriate then -ENOMEM.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> --- fs/ramfs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ramfs.c b/fs/ramfs.c index 341b6130de..800b03af29 100644 --- a/fs/ramfs.c +++ b/fs/ramfs.c @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static int ramfs_truncate(struct device_d *dev, FILE *f, loff_t size) } else { node->data = ramfs_get_chunk(); if (!node->data) - return -ENOMEM; + return -ENOSPC; data = node->data; oldchunks = 1; } @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int ramfs_truncate(struct device_d *dev, FILE *f, loff_t size) while (newchunks > oldchunks) { data->next = ramfs_get_chunk(); if (!data->next) - return -ENOMEM; + return -ENOSPC; data = data->next; oldchunks++; } -- 2.27.0 _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
