We need to write DW_IC_ENABLE_ENABLE (1 << 0) to the register to enable,
but instead we were writing true. This happens to work, but is quite
unusual. Make the code more readable.

Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c 
b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
index 33f89148f0cc..bb9a0b7c4ad4 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
@@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ static inline struct dw_i2c_dev *to_dw_i2c_dev(struct 
i2c_adapter *a)
 
 static void i2c_dw_enable(struct dw_i2c_dev *dw, bool enable)
 {
+       u32 reg = 0;
+
        /*
         * This subrotine is an implementation of an algorithm
         * described in "Cyclone V Hard Processor System Technical
@@ -128,12 +130,13 @@ static void i2c_dw_enable(struct dw_i2c_dev *dw, bool 
enable)
         */
        int timeout = MAX_T_POLL_COUNT;
 
-       enable = enable ? DW_IC_ENABLE_ENABLE : 0;
+       if (enable)
+               reg |= DW_IC_ENABLE_ENABLE;
 
        do {
                uint32_t ic_enable_status;
 
-               writel(enable, dw->base + DW_IC_ENABLE);
+               writel(reg, dw->base + DW_IC_ENABLE);
 
                ic_enable_status = readl(dw->base + DW_IC_ENABLE_STATUS);
                if ((ic_enable_status & DW_IC_ENABLE_STATUS_IC_EN) == enable)
-- 
2.27.0


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to