On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:44:35PM -0500, Mike Nawrocki wrote:
> The smc911x driver probe routine polls the READY bit using
> wait_on_timeout, which returns 0 on success. The error check following
> the wait_on_timeout invocation in the probe routine interprets a
> returned 0 as failure.
> 
> This patch correctly interprets the return value of wait_on_timeout.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Nawrocki <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/smc911x.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied, thanks

Sascha

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> index ea7cea5f1..1edc16ce4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int smc911x_probe(struct device_d *dev)
>        * forbidden while this bit isn't set. Try for 100ms
>        */
>       ret = wait_on_timeout(100 * MSECOND, smc911x_reg_read(priv, PMT_CTRL) & 
> PMT_CTRL_READY);
> -     if (!ret) {
> +     if (ret) {
>               dev_err(dev, "Device not READY in 100ms aborting\n");
>               return -ENODEV;
>       }
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to