On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:58:10AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:11:44PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > +int at91_mci_bio_init(struct pbl_bio *bio, void __iomem *base,
> > + unsigned int clock, unsigned int slot)
> > +{
> > + struct atmel_mci_priv *priv = &atmci_sdcard;
> > + struct atmel_mci *host = &priv->host;
> > + struct mci_ios ios = { .bus_width = MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4, .clock = 25000000
> > };
> > +
> > + bio->priv = priv;
> > + bio->read = at91_mci_bio_read;
> > +
> > + host->regs = base;
> > +
> > + atmci_get_cap(host);
> > +
> > + /* get real HZ */
> > + host->bus_hz = clock;
> > +
> > + host->slot_b = slot;
> > + if (host->slot_b)
> > + host->sdc_reg = ATMCI_SDCSEL_SLOT_B;
> > + else
> > + host->sdc_reg = ATMCI_SDCSEL_SLOT_A;
> > +
> > + atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_DTOR, 0x7f);
> > +
> > + atmci_common_set_ios(host, &ios);
>
> Is it necessary to call this? The ROM should have already configured the
> controller. By relying on this you could drop the controller
> initialization code from PBL.
We get MCI controller in disabled state. I do not see any way to avoid
reconfiguration.
Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
