On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 1:04 AM Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> wrote:
> @@ -151,6 +151,11 @@ static struct rk_bootsource bootdev_map[] = {
> { .src = BOOTSOURCE_SPI_NOR, .instance = 0 },
> { .src = BOOTSOURCE_SPI_NAND, .instance = 0 },
> { .src = BOOTSOURCE_MMC, .instance = 1 },
> + { .src = BOOTSOURCE_UNKNOWN, .instance = 0 },
> + { .src = BOOTSOURCE_UNKNOWN, .instance = 0 },
> + { .src = BOOTSOURCE_UNKNOWN, .instance = 0 },
> + { .src = BOOTSOURCE_UNKNOWN, .instance = 0 },
> + { .src = BOOTSOURCE_USB, .instance = 0 },
> };
Instead of blank entries, one could do designated array initialization
(since BOOTSOURCE_UNKNOWN is 0):
static struct rk_bootsource bootdev_map[] = {
[0x01] = { .src = BOOTSOURCE_NAND, .instance = 0 },
[0x02] = { .src = BOOTSOURCE_MMC, .instance = 0 },
[0x03] = { .src = BOOTSOURCE_SPI_NOR, .instance = 0 },
[0x04] = { .src = BOOTSOURCE_SPI_NAND, .instance = 0 },
[0x05] = { .src = BOOTSOURCE_MMC, .instance = 1 },
[0x0a] = { .src = BOOTSOURCE_USB, .instance = 0 },
};
I also like the way the register value shows up in the table.
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
