Hello Ahmad, On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 03:58:04PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > GCC correctly warns that two bit wide compr_type can't > exceed or be equal to UBIFS_COMPR_TYPES_CNT (== 4). > > Remove the check. The check is there in the kernel as well, > but the warning is disabled there. > > Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <[email protected]> > --- > fs/ubifs/super.c | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c > index b48e21fae636..6a0074bd1a5c 100644 > --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c > +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c > @@ -86,11 +86,6 @@ static int validate_inode(struct ubifs_info *c, const > struct inode *inode) > return 1; > } > > - if (ui->compr_type >= UBIFS_COMPR_TYPES_CNT) { > - ubifs_err(c, "unknown compression type %d", ui->compr_type); > - return 2; > - } > -
I taked to Richard Weinberger about this check in the kernel via irc:
1656326473 < ukleinek> derRichard: I don't feel like increasing my
kernel patch count, so I'm just reporting here:
https://lore.barebox.org/[email protected]
1656326538 <@derRichard> oh
1656326817 <@derRichard> yeah looks like we need to enlarge struct
ubifs_inode
1656327489 < sha> derRichard: Only when the next compression type comes
1656327499 < sha> derRichard: For now it's enough to remove the check
1656328989 <@derRichard> sha: yeah, i'd rather keep the check.
1656329007 <@derRichard> if we add a new type we'll forget to re-add the
check for sure
1656330552 < sha> derRichard: Ah, I thought the on-flash format has two
bits, but it's only the in-memory structures. Then we can change
the width to 3 bits without problem
1656331100 <@derRichard> exactly
1656331149 <@derRichard> i think it is anyway time ot reevaluate the
bitfields in struct ubifs_inode, i'm not so sure whether they
really pay off these days
Given the kernel wants to keep the check, maybe it's easier to keep it
in barebox, too?!
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
