On 13.10.22 13:52, Marco Felsch wrote: > Hi Ahmad, > On 22-10-13, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: >> TL;DR: GCC can prove that variables aren't supposed to overlap and as >> such it generated code than readded get_runtime_offset() on top of an >> already relocated linker-defined variable's address. >> See PATCH 2/3 for a disassembly of the affected code. Board code can >> be similarly micompiled, but that's a fix for another day. > > I didn't received a 2/3 nor a 1/3 yet. Does it stuck somewhere?
At least lore.barebox.org got it: https://lore.barebox.org/barebox/[email protected]/T/#t > > Regards, > Marco > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
