On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:37:50AM +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> From: Bruno Knittel <bruno.knit...@bruker.com>
>
> The Intel documentation states that the FPGA configuration might fail.
> This has been observed on the Enclustra AA1+ board where up to 4 retries
> where required to configure the FPGA.
>
> Debugging session showed that the data where correctly read from the
> eMMC but yet the configuration failed.
>
> This commit introduces a retry loop on the FPGA configuration.
> Up to 10 retries (arbitrary) are attempted.
> As the hardware can't be used anyway without the FPGA loaded, this
> doesn't introduce any boot time problems. Taking longer is better than
> just hang()ing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruno Knittel <bruno.knit...@bruker.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumt...@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/arria10-xload.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/arria10-xload.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/arria10-xload.c
> index 9d54a1de58..0e49452c17 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/arria10-xload.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/arria10-xload.c
> @@ -359,33 +359,46 @@ int arria10_load_fpga(int offset, int bitstream_size)
> int ret;
> uint32_t count;
> uint32_t size = bitstream_size / SECTOR_SIZE;
> + uint32_t retryCount;
>
> if (offset)
> offset = offset / SECTOR_SIZE;
>
> - count = offset;
> + /* Up to 4 retires have been seen on the Enclustra Mercury AA1+ board,
> as FPGA configuration is mandatory
Respect. Most people retire only once ;)
> + * to be able to continue the boot, take some margin and try up to 10
> times
> + */
> + for (retryCount = 0; retryCount < 10; ++retryCount) {
> + count = offset;
>
> - arria10_read_blocks(buf, count + bitstream.first_sec, SZ_16K);
> + arria10_read_blocks(buf, count + bitstream.first_sec, SZ_16K);
>
> - count += SZ_16K / SECTOR_SIZE;
> + count += SZ_16K / SECTOR_SIZE;
>
> - ret = a10_fpga_init(buf);
> - if (ret)
> - hang();
> + ret = a10_fpga_init(buf);
> + if (ret)
> + continue;
>
> - while (count <= size) {
> - ret = a10_fpga_write(buf, SZ_16K);
> - if (ret == -ENOSPC)
> - break;
> - count += SZ_16K / SECTOR_SIZE;
> - ret = arria10_read_blocks(buf, count, SZ_16K);
> - }
> + while (count <= size) {
> + ret = a10_fpga_write(buf, SZ_16K);
> + if (ret == -ENOSPC)
> + continue;
You probably want to continue the outer for() loop, but this continues
the inner while() loop.
Generally I think both the patch and the resulting code would look nicer
when you do the retry loop in a separate function.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
