This had previously been reverted as it may cause some stack usage. Now that we have a stack on entry, it should be safe to so.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <[email protected]> --- arch/arm/boards/avnet-zedboard/lowlevel.c | 1 - arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpu_init.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/avnet-zedboard/lowlevel.c b/arch/arm/boards/avnet-zedboard/lowlevel.c index c681764bd009..1ecddf24085f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boards/avnet-zedboard/lowlevel.c +++ b/arch/arm/boards/avnet-zedboard/lowlevel.c @@ -301,7 +301,6 @@ ENTRY_FUNCTION_WITHSTACK(start_avnet_zedboard, 0xfffff000, r0, r1, r2) writel((1<<7), 0xe000a208 ); // Output enable writel((1<<7), 0xe000a040 ); // DATA Register - arm_cpu_lowlevel_init(); zynq_cpu_lowlevel_init(); avnet_zedboard_ps7_init(); diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpu_init.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpu_init.c index 7194c7e21627..cc7b8d1142a9 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpu_init.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/cpu_init.c @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ void zynq_cpu_lowlevel_init(void) { + arm_cpu_lowlevel_init(); + enable_arm_errata_761320_war(); enable_arm_errata_794072_war(); enable_arm_errata_845369_war(); -- 2.47.1
