On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 06:33:28PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 25-05-26, Michael Tretter wrote:
> > The PBL has to pass a full description of the SDRAM to OP-TEE to allow
> > OP-TEE to handle dynamic shared memory in the entire SDRAM. Thus, the
> > PBL needs to read the full memory configuration.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Tretter <m.tret...@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-rockchip/dmc.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  include/mach/rockchip/dmc.h  |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/dmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/dmc.c
> > index 
> > 62a7ef8f1e38e989e84f08f6f4a6586be3e85532..260b8be9c7da9e8f83323822eab92a439ef4e2ef
> >  100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/dmc.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/dmc.c
> > @@ -171,11 +171,12 @@ resource_size_t rk3568_ram0_size(void)
> >  #define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG4           0x210
> >  #define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG5           0x214
> >  
> > -resource_size_t rk3588_ram0_size(void)
> > +size_t rk3588_ram_sizes(phys_addr_t *base, resource_size_t *size, size_t n)
> 
> Nit: could be void since you don't check the return value.

The return value is used in a later patch. There the array size is
passed in 'n' and the actually used array entries are returned from
rk3588_ram_sizes().

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Reply via email to