To further sync the nvmem code base port Linux commit:

| commit 345ec382cd4b736c36e01f155d08c913b225b736
| Author: Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc>
| Date:   Tue Apr 4 18:21:24 2023 +0100
|
|     nvmem: core: add per-cell post processing
|
|     Instead of relying on the name the consumer is using for the cell, like
|     it is done for the nvmem .cell_post_process configuration parameter,
|     provide a per-cell post processing hook. This can then be populated by
|     the NVMEM provider (or the NVMEM layout) when adding the cell.
|
|     Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc>
|     Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.ray...@bootlin.com>
|     Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org>
|     Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230404172148.82422-17-srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org
|     Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.fel...@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/nvmem/core.c           | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/nvmem-provider.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 
abb576af01ae0f8fc2d1e2f30ec9d0d22cd2a4fa..0c78d61e3c58fbe019a1def08d06e2ecf561a9b1
 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct nvmem_cell_entry {
        int                     bytes;
        int                     bit_offset;
        int                     nbits;
+       nvmem_cell_post_process_t read_post_process;
        struct device_node      *np;
        struct nvmem_device     *nvmem;
        struct list_head        node;
@@ -242,6 +243,7 @@ static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_entry_nodup(struct 
nvmem_device *nvmem,
        cell->raw_len = info->raw_len ?: info->bytes;
        cell->bytes = info->bytes;
        cell->name = info->name;
+       cell->read_post_process = info->read_post_process;
 
        cell->bit_offset = info->bit_offset;
        cell->nbits = info->nbits;
@@ -829,6 +831,13 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
        if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits)
                nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf);
 
+       if (cell->read_post_process) {
+               rc = cell->read_post_process(nvmem->priv, id, index,
+                               cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes);
+               if (rc)
+                       return rc;
+       }
+
        if (nvmem->cell_post_process) {
                rc = nvmem->cell_post_process(nvmem->priv, id, index,
                                              cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes);
@@ -937,6 +946,14 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_entry_write(struct 
nvmem_cell_entry *cell, const void *b
            (cell->bit_offset == 0 && len != cell->bytes))
                return -EINVAL;
 
+       /*
+        * Any cells which have a cell_post_process hook are read-only because
+        * we cannot reverse the operation and it might affect other cells,
+        * too.
+        */
+       if (cell->read_post_process)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
        if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits) {
                buf = nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(cell, buf, len);
                if (IS_ERR(buf))
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index 
44c6b76ccc5212a72bffe694308321ce1b27e470..892e3604ef83ef8b616041f5d4dbfdcae1136fc9
 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ typedef int (*nvmem_cell_post_process_t)(void *priv, const 
char *id, int index,
  * @bit_offset:        Bit offset if cell is smaller than a byte.
  * @nbits:     Number of bits.
  * @np:                Optional device_node pointer.
+ * @read_post_process: Callback for optional post processing of cell data
+ *                     on reads.
  */
 struct nvmem_cell_info {
        const char              *name;
@@ -47,6 +49,7 @@ struct nvmem_cell_info {
        unsigned int            bit_offset;
        unsigned int            nbits;
        struct device_node      *np;
+       nvmem_cell_post_process_t read_post_process;
 };
 
 /**

-- 
2.39.5


Reply via email to