On Mon, 08 Dec 2025 11:32:35 +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> printf: use printf instead of printk in no_printk
>
> The original commit was decoupling them a bit to allow for implementing
> a printk with Linux semantics. This also requires us that no_printf has
> no dependency on printk, but that was missed. Add that now.
>
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] fixup! printf: define printk/no_printk in terms of prints
https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=e5a7137b3d1b (link may
not be stable)
Best regards,
--
Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
