Hi Johannes,

On 2026-06-16 14:49, Johannes Schneider wrote:
> barebox's PBL ships a generic-C sha256_transform() that runs roughly
> 1.6 MB/s on a Cortex-A53. Callers that hash MB-scale blobs in the PBL
> -- e.g. the fw-external SHA-256 verify on i.MX8M, ~720 KiB of BL32 --
> spend hundreds of ms in the transform even with the D-cache warm.
> 
> Wire the asm core in arch/arm/crypto/sha2-ce-core.S into the PBL link
> and expose it through a new sha256_transform_blocks() entry point.
> The asm has an internal multi-block loop; a single call amortises the
> prologue (round-constant load, state load) over the whole input, which
> makes the difference between ~200 ms (per-block calls) and ~5 ms
> (batched) on the BL32 verify.
> 
> Rewire sha256_update()'s bulk path to call sha256_transform_blocks()
> with the remaining block count rather than looping over a single-block
> transform. The generic-C path gets a trivial blocks-wrapping shim so
> both code paths share the same caller-side API.
> 
> The asm needs two link-time constants (sha256_ce_offsetof_count and
> sha256_ce_offsetof_finalize) which we provide locally rather than
> pulling in sha2-ce-glue.c -- the glue drags crypto-API and
> kernel_neon_begin shims that the PBL has no use for.
> 
> Measured on i.MX8MM and i.MX8MP, ~720 KiB SHA-256 verify with MMU on:
>   ~300 ms (generic-C)
>   -> 17 ms (crypto-ext, single block per call)
>   -> 3-5 ms (crypto-ext, batched).
> Both crypto-ext savings carry over with MMU off too, just shifted up
> by the uncached-DRAM read cost.
> 
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-7
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schneider <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/crypto/Makefile |  3 ++
>  crypto/Kconfig           | 12 ++++++++
>  crypto/sha2.c            | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/crypto/Makefile b/arch/arm/crypto/Makefile
> index 55b3ac0538..72d4bd77c0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/crypto/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/crypto/Makefile
> @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ sha1-ce-y := sha1-ce-glue.o sha1-ce-core.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA256_ARM64_CE) += sha2-ce.o
>  sha2-ce-y := sha2-ce-glue.o sha2-ce-core.o
>  
> +# Reuse the asm core (glue is provided inline in crypto/sha2.c).
> +pbl-$(CONFIG_PBL_DIGEST_SHA256_ARM64_CE) += sha2-ce-core.o
> +
>  quiet_cmd_perl = PERL    $@
>        cmd_perl = $(PERL) $(<) > $(@)
>  
> diff --git a/crypto/Kconfig b/crypto/Kconfig
> index 528e9a0d22..3dfb316b32 100644
> --- a/crypto/Kconfig
> +++ b/crypto/Kconfig
> @@ -107,6 +107,18 @@ config DIGEST_SHA256_ARM64_CE
>         Architecture: arm64 using:
>         - ARMv8 Crypto Extensions
>  
> +config PBL_DIGEST_SHA256_ARM64_CE
> +     bool "SHA-256 in PBL via ARMv8 Crypto Extensions"
> +     depends on CPU_V8 && PBL_IMAGE
> +     help
> +       Use ARMv8 Crypto Extensions (sha256h/sha256h2/sha256su0/sha256su1)
> +       for the SHA-256 transform inside the PBL. Roughly 100x faster than
> +       the generic-C transform; for callers that hash large blobs (e.g.
> +       fw-external SHA-256 verifies) this is the difference between tens
> +       of ms and hundreds. Requires Cortex-A53 or later with the optional
> +       Crypto Extensions feature.
> +
> +
>  endif
>  
>  config CRYPTO_PBKDF2
> diff --git a/crypto/sha2.c b/crypto/sha2.c

Don't modify this file for adding a special purpose sha256
implementation.

Instead create a pbl/sha256.c where you have a

pbl_sha256(void *buf, size_t size)

In this pick the best available implementation.

Sascha


Reply via email to