Hi,

   Â

   I don't think one can accuse Denis of having "hijacked" or "passed on
   works by Ennemond as his own". On the contrary, he was careful to
   distinguish their respective works in the Livre de tablature (for which
   he took a privilege as early as December 1669
   ([1]http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b90632544/f89.item), but which
   appeared only after his death. Most confusions in the attributions are
   due to people who copied the pieces into their lute books, often years
   after their composition, and also that the editors of the CNRS Vieux
   Gaultier volume included in their edition everything they found
   attributed to him at least once, without questioning the accurateness
   of the attributions.

   Â

   As to Ennemond's pieces being transcribed from earlier tunings, this
   undoubtedly occurred for one of them, but not necessarily for many
   more. When I studied the repertoire in accords nouveaux, almost thirty
   years ago, I was surprised to find how few pieces had versions in both
   old tuning and accords nouveaux or in both accords nouveaux and d-minor
   tuning. Of course, many sources have been lost, but none of those which
   has reappeared since has contradicted this notion. Add to this that the
   d-minor tuning must have appeared shortly before 1638, when the first
   pieces on this tuning appeared, and that Ennemond lived until 1651 and
   had thus time to compose in this tuning.

   Â

   I would understand Smith's sentence, as he speaks of "fine" music, as
   expressing rather his personal appreciation. But there are ways to know
   how Denis Gaultier was appreciated by his contemporaries.
   1) Both Gaultiers are the only identified composers whose works were
   copied, in addition to their own works, by three lutenists-composers
   whose hand may be identified with confidence in lute manuscripts:
   Charles Mouton, Henry de Launay and Pierre Dubut le fils (the latter
   has also copied works by his father) ; Julien Blouin, by whom only a
   few works are known and who on the contrary copied works by a greater
   number of composers, made a complete copy of the "Pieces de luth" in
   one of his manuscripts, adding to them pieces by various other
   composers.
   2) But the manuscript "La rhétorique des dieux" has been designed as
   "un assemblage des plus belles pièces de luth de l'illustre Denis
   Gaultier", even if at least one piece by Ennemond seems to have slipped
   among them (there is no proof that Denis had any role in the choice of
   the pieces).

   3) Likewise, Pierre Baudouin de Montarcis (the one mentioned in the
   preface of the Livre de tablature) refers to Denis as "l'Orfée de
   notre siecle", but ignores Ennemond (see
   [2]http://msl.cat/revista/56%20Goy.pdf, pp. 87-92).
   4) Three tombeaux were dedicated to Denis in addition to the one he
   wrote for himself: by Jacques Gallot, Charles Mouton and a lost one by
   his pupil Marianne Plantier. No tombeau appears to have been dedicated
   to Old Gaultier.

   Â

   Thus, it would seem that on one hand, the output of Ennemond and Denis
   may have been more or less considered as a whole by 17th-century
   lutenists, as their pieces are often mingled in the manuscripts, often
   without a clear attribution to either of them, or with conflicting
   attributions, and on the other hand, there really was a high regard for
   Denis in the second half of the century, maybe from people who knew him
   and had heard him in person.

   Â

   Best wishes,

   Â

   François-Pierre Goy

   Â

   Â

   02.12.2017, 23:39, "G. C." :

     Â Â Â Claude Chauvel:
     Â Â Â We may also recall the anecdote told by burlesque D'Assoucy,
     in which
     Â Â Â old Gaultier was given a good thrashing by the people of his
     village
     Â Â Â who, "catching sight of the dusky face of this blackamoor" ,
     mistook
     Â Â Â him for the werewolf... The man's appearance : a surly yet
     sensual
     Â Â Â fellow, independent-minded, even slightly misanthropic,
     conscious of
     Â Â Â his art and refusing any subservience, he was often caustic
     about his
     Â Â Â colleagues such as his cousin Denis whom he thought "fitt to
     goe along
     Â Â Â with a buriall".
     Â Â Â ... However a hundred or so of his [Ennemond's] pieces have
     survived -
     Â Â Â all of them written in the OLD TUNE and collected in several
     Â Â Â manuscripts from the early XVIIth century; ... it was not
     until 1672
     Â Â Â that fifteen of old Gaultier's best pieces were engraved in
     the Livre
     Â Â Â de Tablature compiled by his cousin Denis ; these pieces were
     to figure
     Â Â Â high up among the best ones in many collections of German
     origin well
     Â Â Â into the XVIIIth century.
     Â Â Â [1988] CD Booklet Astree E 8703
     Â Â Â On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Jean-Marie Poirier
     Â Â Â
     Â Â Â :-D !!!
        > Le 2 déc. 2017 à 20:40, G. C. a écrit :
     Â Â Â >
     Â Â Â > So did Denis pass on works of Ennemond as being his own, and
     not
     Â Â Â only
     Â Â Â > transcribing them from vieil tone and getting huge credit
     from D.
     Â Â Â A.
     Â Â Â > Smith 40 years ago for that?
     Â Â Â >
     Â Â Â > --
     Â Â Â >
     Â Â Â >

References

   1. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b90632544/f89.item)
   2. http://msl.cat/revista/56 Goy.pdf


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to