(Sorry for the delay in responding. I'm still slowly playing catchup with the mailing list. I'll get to things eventually. :-) )
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:50:45AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 20:49 -0500, Christopher Stover wrote: > > > Are there any plans to implement a newer version of libopensync since > > FC doesn't support 0.22? > > opensync 0.3 is a very bad idea to include in a distribution, [snipped good advice that Fedora might want to listen to] > I expect there'll be a Barry plugin for the new opensync once they > actually get a stable (0.4) release out - would that be correct, Chris? Hi Adam and Chris, Yes, I'm planning to port, and hopefully enhance, the opensync plugin to 0.3x if I have time before their stable release, and to 0.4x if I don't have time. I'm expecting an opensync 0.4x release any month now, so this porting job is rather high on my list. I'll probably duplicate the opensync-plugin tree in Barry, so there will be sources for both an 0.22 plugin, and a 0.4x plugin, since I assume 0.22 won't be disappearing right away. - Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Barry-devel mailing list Barry-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/barry-devel
