Thanks for your answer. >> There is MailScanner v.4.79 in Debian Stable now and on my servers it'll >> remain so. >> > MailScanner in debian is not at 4.79 due to stability, it is at that version > because its has been orphaned and has no maintainer > > Sability is also about dependencies. So if I install non-debian version of MailScanner, who can say that whole system will not go hell in near future? I had several oportunities in my life to manage servers with MailScanner installed from source packages. It was always problem when I wanted to make dist-upgrade. Due to dependent packages. So official version of MailScanner is holy cow for me :-)
It would be nice for me, when Baruwa was a modest follower of MailWatch without new features I don't need... So MailWatch 1.0.4 is not bad software and I will prefer it on Debian production servers. >> Is there something so importrant in MailScanner v.> 4.79 which makes Baruwa >> 1.1 lose its sense? Why so blood edge dependencies? >> > I can hardly call one version above 4.79 bleeding edge, Baruwa requires > MailScanner>= 4.80.1 because of the DB DSN options in MailScanner.conf > Yes :-) This is bleeding edge feature :-) So many years I could live without it... Good work, Andrew, but I still supose Baruwa as developing unstable software, I still stay working on Baruwa translation, but using it for prodution work - I'm afraid. Viktor _______________________________________________ Baruwa mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baruwa.org/mailman/listinfo/baruwa Keep Baruwa FREE - http://pledgie.com/campaigns/12056
