I tried both, and only the latest worked, i.e., BaseX901-20180411.084824.exe

I guess my question could be reformulated as follows: why isn't the version in 
/releases/latest/ [1] the same one as the one you download when you click 
"download" on the website [2]? Said otherwise, why doesn't the download page 
refer to the latest release? Are releases in [1] perhaps developer snapshots 
rather than actual product releases? In addition, what is the difference 
between latest/ and the BaseX-latest.* files? 

Thanks


[1] http://files.basex.org/releases/latest/
[2] http://basex.org/download/ leading to 
http://files.basex.org/releases/9.0/BaseX90.exe 

-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Grün [mailto:christian.gr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: vrijdag 13 april 2018 12:16
To: Bram Vanroy <bram.van...@ugent.be>
Cc: BaseX <basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de>
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] FW: Java 9 and BaseX 9

Hi Bram,

Did you download the "latest developer snapshot" or the official 9.0 release?

Best,
Christian



On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Bram Vanroy <bram.van...@ugent.be> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: Bram Vanroy
> Sent: vrijdag 13 april 2018 11:03
> To: 'basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de'
> <basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de>
> Subject: Java 9 and BaseX 9
>
>
>
> Hello list
>
>
>
> I just downloaded and installed the most recent version of Java and 
> tried to install the latest version (from the download web page) of 
> Basex. However, upon launching the installer I get the message “Must 
> install Java before running the installer”. When looking through the 
> mailing list, I already found this issue but it was marked as solved. 
> [1] The problem still occurs, though. Perhaps the issue is that the 
> {url}/releases/latest isn’t the same download as you get from using 
> the {url}//download page. If they are different, than perhaps these 
> should be put in sync so that you always get the latest version when 
> downloading.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Bram Vanroy
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://www.mail-archive.com/basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de/msg104
> 17.html
>
>

Reply via email to