On 20 March 2010 13:22, Dr. Robert Marmorstein <rob...@narnia.homeunix.com> wrote: >> It's ported, the use of the qt3 support library doesn't mean that it isn't >> ported. Removing Qt3 support before 2.0 is a nice to have. >> > > Unfortunately, this isn't quite true. While I did manage to pull out almost > All of the Qt3/KDE3 classes from BasKet, the central widget is a "Q3Scollview" > and still needs to be ported to a QGraphicsView. I'm working on it, but > because it's such an essential class, it affects a LOT of code in the > codebase. > I think the "qgv" branch I'm using to work on this is on gitorious, so feel > free to hack on it... > > So we do still need Qt3Support for now, but eventually that problem will bite > the dust... > > Robert >
Is there really any real benefit of removing Qt3Support classes other than cleanliness? I really don't think that's a very high priority. Unless I'm mistaken, doesn't anyone that uses KDE programs generally still need this library? Or are most other apps clean of this already? -- Kelvie Wong ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Basket-devel mailing list Basket-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basket-devel
