Stephane Hillion wrote: > >> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:09 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: Gump logo >> >> The conflict appears to be between batik-ext.jar and xml-apis.jar >> http://gump.covalent.net/jars/2002-04-02/xml-commons/xml-apis.jar >> http://gump.covalent.net/jars/2002-04-02/xml-batik/batik-ext.jar >> >> If every project has their own private version of the various org.w3c >> org.xml interfaces only invites integration problems such as these. This >> will likely also cause problems with future versions of the JDK. > > batik-ext.jar contains the version of SAX used by crimson. What is the > problem with Batik here? > I think your problem comes from the fact that you use the latest version of > xml-api.jar which is not in sync with crimson. > > So we can re-state the problem: "can xml-api.jar be used programmatically > from within an application which makes use of crimson"?
That's quite a different question. Batik, if I understand correctly, can be used by applications such as cocoon. Does the use of batik in such a way mandate that cocoon standardize on the version of crimson that batik uses? Does my desire to use Xerces2 preclude my further use of Batik? - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
