> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 5:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Gump logo > > > > > So we can re-state the problem: "can xml-api.jar be used > programmatically > > from within an application which makes use of crimson"? > > That's quite a different question. Batik, if I understand correctly, can > be used by applications such as cocoon. Does the use of batik in such a > way mandate that cocoon standardize on the version of crimson that batik > uses?
Batik is linked to a given version of SAX, because it implements the ContentHandler interface, and some others. So yes, cocoon must standardize on the version of SAX that Batik use (which is the version used by the latest crimson, but it is a detail). > > Does my desire to use Xerces2 preclude my further use of Batik? > Your desires are bounded by the Java Virtual Machine Specification and the classpath mecanism. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
