Will do. We temporarily tweaked the class for our internal testing and it worked well. Any rough timeframe on an official next release? And I wholeheartedly agree that the spec (or, more properly, "specs", since some base XML behaviors are involved here) is ambiguous.
Thanks! - Rick -----Original Message----- From: Thomas DeWeese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 6:01 AM To: batik-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Whitespace Handling in Batik vs ASV Hi Rick, You might want to check out current CVS Batik. I just delivered an updated version that has "improved" whitespace handling. I still don't think the specification is at all clear on what the proper behavior is, but in your simple case the new behavior should be what you want. I mostly did this because there were places where the old code would behave in violation of what the SVG specification does specify, and the new version is _much_ cleaner and easier to follow (IMHO). Also it should be easier to bring into conformance with whatever the SVG-WG decides on. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
