DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38183>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38183 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-15 01:52 ------- In reply to comment #6) > Today, it suddenly dawned on me that it would be better if we actually started > to populate XML Graphics Commons with this. After all, FOP now uses the codecs > directly (read and write) and it would be good if we also decoupled these > Sun-dependent codecs from FOP. So why not just copy the codecs and add the > ImageWriters to Commons? I think I'll just do that. We have to start at some > point. :-) Well I have this mostly working in my local area. I now have it passing the Batik regression tests... as long as it still uses the 'original' readers and writers. > Still, the question remains about the placement of the sources. We will > certainly need a java-1.3 and a java-1.4 directory for the GraphicsConfiguration > classes coming from FOP. I think it would be good to place the codecs under > java-sun-dep (as replacement for the "sources-internal-codec" suggested > earlier). Thomas, I know you prefer to put everything under one tree but how > opposed are you to such a (IMO) clean split? I don't understand the need to split these sources out... What I did in my local repository is created codec/jpeg|png|tiff|jiio packages and the source for that codec goes in that package. I've modified the build so that when it can it builds everything (i.e. on a "sun" JDK 1.4 and higher) Then the services class may reject some at runtime (like because it can't 'link' the JIIO code under jdk 1.3). > For those who don't know what XML Graphics Commons is: > http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics/XmlGraphicsCommonComponents Depending on what others think I would like to check in what I have (preferably to trunk, but I could spin a branch). Since the jiio stuff still isn't quite right (however it's close) I'd probably comment them out of the services meta-inf file. Even if we move everything to commons this can be easier once everything is under SVN. What do people think? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
