Hi all,
In Xerces, I recently implemented the DOM Element Traversal specification [1] and was planning to add org.w3c.dom.ElementTraversal to xml-apis.jar in XML Commons. Normally the DOM specifications are accompanied with a zip file (e.g. DOM Level 3 [2]), containing the Java binding for the API with each of the source files having the W3C license/copyright header on each of them. For whatever reason the Web Applications Working Group didn't produce such a file for ElementTraversal but instead pasted the definition of the interface [3] (without Javadoc or any comments) directly into the specification. This seems to imply that someone wanting to use ElementTraversal in Java must create the source file for the interface themselves. I looked around the web and found that Batik [4] already did this work. I was thinking of just linking the file from Batik into XML Commons but wanted to check whether the license on it was correct first. Usually source files for org.w3c.dom.* have the W3C copyright notice / license header. This one has the ASF header. I'm not sure which one should be in there. I assume the file wasn't created by the W3C but the interface definition would have come from the Element Traversal specification which has its own license [5]. Has anyone in Batik land explored this before and if so what was the conclusion? Thanks. [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xerces/java/trunk/src/org/apache/xerces/dom/ElementImpl.java?view=markup&pathrev=730053 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-DOM-Level-3-Core-20040407/java-binding.zip [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-ElementTraversal-20081222/#java-bindings [4] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/batik/trunk/sources/org/w3c/dom/ElementTraversal.java?revision=601947&view=markup [5] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231 Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected]
