Michael Glavassevich/Toronto/i...@ibmca wrote on 01/11/2009 11:45:14 PM: <snip/>
> > Am I correct in thinking that if the interface is mistakenly covered by > > the Document License, that we shouldn?t be including it? > > If it is covered by the Document License [1] it seems like there's > some way to comply by following the three instructions in the > license. I've never seen an example of this though. While reading the W3C Document License I missed this caveat: "No right to create modifications or derivatives of W3C documents is granted pursuant to this license." so that doesn't sound acceptable for inclusion of sources in the ASF repository, whereas the W3C Software License [1] would be fine since it allows modifications. At least that's why I'm assuming the W3C Software License is listed under Category A [2]. Thanks. [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231 [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#category-a Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected]
