Hi, +1 the new dependency on XGC is welcome and makes a lot of sense.
2014-08-04 23:44 GMT+02:00 Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com>: > > I would like to merge the Batik svg12color branch to trunk. This work was > done by Jeremias. > > I am interested in using this new functionality with FOP (see attached > example) and from my testing the code works well, and Jeremias also thinks > the code is ready. > > Note that this branch introduces a dependency in xmlgraphics-commons > (which in my opinion is a good thing because for the first time commons > will be common to FOP and Batik!). > > I will wait one week before I merge the code so please voice any opinion > before that if you care. You are also free, and encouraged, to test the > code and vote! > > +1 > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: svgcolor12 branch Date: Fri, > 1 Aug 2014 15:57:10 +0100 From: Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com> > <lmpmberna...@gmail.com> To: batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > Hi Jeremias, > > I tried the merge to trunk and except for the log changes file there > were no conflicts. I assume you don't mind if I proceed with the merge by > launching a vote next week (unless you want to do it yourself). > > Attached is an FOP file (and the resulting PDF generated using the new > Batik jar) with an SVG with CMYK. > > Luis > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jeremias Maerki <d...@jeremias-maerki.ch> > wrote: > >> Hi Luis >> >> I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the e-mails >> from this account which I haven't done for more than a month. >> >> Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still >> maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi support and >> the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten around to >> make the push back into official repositories especially since those API >> changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional >> changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've also >> merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there >> because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little changes to >> URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have >> to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that >> (official) branch. >> >> HTH, >> Jeremias Maerki >> >> >> On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote: >> > >> > Hi Jeremias, >> > >> > I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you created and >> > worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple example) and >> > it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What is the >> > status of the branch (and implementation)? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Luis >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > -- pascal
