+1 from me! Cheers!
Clay -- "My religion is simple. My religion is kindness." - HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet > On Aug 5, 2014, at 12:41 AM, Pascal Sancho <psancho....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 > the new dependency on XGC is welcome and makes a lot of sense. > > > 2014-08-04 23:44 GMT+02:00 Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com>: >> >> I would like to merge the Batik svg12color branch to trunk. This work was >> done by Jeremias. >> >> I am interested in using this new functionality with FOP (see attached >> example) and from my testing the code works well, and Jeremias also thinks >> the code is ready. >> >> Note that this branch introduces a dependency in xmlgraphics-commons (which >> in my opinion is a good thing because for the first time commons will be >> common to FOP and Batik!). >> >> I will wait one week before I merge the code so please voice any opinion >> before that if you care. You are also free, and encouraged, to test the code >> and vote! >> >> +1 >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: svgcolor12 branch >> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:57:10 +0100 >> From: Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com> >> To: batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> >> Hi Jeremias, >> >> I tried the merge to trunk and except for the log changes file there were no >> conflicts. I assume you don't mind if I proceed with the merge by launching >> a vote next week (unless you want to do it yourself). >> >> Attached is an FOP file (and the resulting PDF generated using the new Batik >> jar) with an SVG with CMYK. >> >> Luis >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jeremias Maerki <d...@jeremias-maerki.ch> >> wrote: >>> Hi Luis >>> >>> I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the e-mails >>> from this account which I haven't done for more than a month. >>> >>> Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still >>> maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi support and >>> the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten around to >>> make the push back into official repositories especially since those API >>> changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional >>> changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've also >>> merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there >>> because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little changes to >>> URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have >>> to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that >>> (official) branch. >>> >>> HTH, >>> Jeremias Maerki >>> >>> >>> On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi Jeremias, >>> > >>> > I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you created and >>> > worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple example) and >>> > it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What is the >>> > status of the branch (and implementation)? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Luis >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > > > -- > pascal
