On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 09:16, Peter Hull <peterhul...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm sure I can make the timing more robust. What do you think, is it > worth doing?
I see it also failed once on Ubuntu, that's definitely worse. I wonder if simply using nanoTime instead of currentTimeMillis would work in practice - the docs don't guarantee it has better granularity but it seems to on Windows. The minimum Java version is JDK8, is that correct? Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
