On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, 11:55:06 PM, Thomas wrote: >>>>>> "CL" == Chris Lilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CL>> Why is contextual shaping ocurring in one case but not in the CL>> other? TED>> It happens in both cases for me CL>> OK so, its a Java 1.4 thing. Are you getting rtl text as well? TED> Yes, didn't you get my attached PNG? Yes, but I had not noticed it ... sorry. Yes, your rendering looks correct. Its Right to left, has contextual forms, and has the mandatory ligatures such as lam-aleef. TED> My Batik rendering looks the same (to my untrained eye) as the TED> Note Pad rendering, except it looked better :) (the font is nicer I think). The notepad one was rendered in Tahoma, which is a sans-serif. Yours is a serif font, so closer to a traditional calligraphic style.. So, whats up (or changed) in Java 1.4? Clearly Batik should be tested against the testsuite with 1.3, anyway. -- Chris mailto:chris@;w3.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
