Hi, On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 22:25, John Parisi wrote: > Just so you can see what I'm talking about, I've attached the source SVG > image as well as the converted PNGs. You can clearly see that the image > created with Batik is distorted for some reason, whereas the image created > via ImageMagick looks great. > > I have Batik 1.5.1 (on Windows 2000) and I used the following command to > create the 'test-batik.png' image: > "java -jar batik-rasterizer.jar Fire_Station_S2.svg" > > Any ideas as to why the quality of the png is so poor using Batik verses > ImageMagick? I would prefer to use Batik if possible.....
I am not sure, but I think it is because the circle/ellipse it not true circle/ellipse. It it made up circle using <path>. Try to set the anti alias on/off on batik to see the result. Regards Tonny Kohar -- Sketsa SVG Graphics Editor http://www.kiyut.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]