Hi,

On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 22:25, John Parisi wrote:
> Just so you can see what I'm talking about, I've attached the source SVG
> image as well as the converted PNGs.  You can clearly see that the image
> created with Batik is distorted for some reason, whereas the image created
> via ImageMagick looks great.
> 
> I have Batik 1.5.1 (on Windows 2000) and I used the following command to
> create the 'test-batik.png' image:
>     "java -jar batik-rasterizer.jar Fire_Station_S2.svg"
> 
> Any ideas as to why the quality of the png is so poor using Batik verses
> ImageMagick?  I would prefer to use Batik if possible.....

I am not sure, but I think it is because the circle/ellipse it not true
circle/ellipse. It it made up circle using <path>. Try to set the anti
alias on/off on batik to see the result.

Regards
Tonny Kohar
-- 
Sketsa 
SVG Graphics Editor
http://www.kiyut.com



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to