Hi Tonny, Thanks for the reply. I tried turning anti-aliasing off ... by adding shape-rendering="crispEdges" to the outermost <svg> element. This produces a slightly better image... but still not nearly as good as the one ImageMagick produced.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tonny Kohar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Batik Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 1:24 PM Subject: Re: Poor quality results rasterizing SVG images (Samples attached). > Hi, > > On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 22:25, John Parisi wrote: > > Just so you can see what I'm talking about, I've attached the source SVG > > image as well as the converted PNGs. You can clearly see that the image > > created with Batik is distorted for some reason, whereas the image created > > via ImageMagick looks great. > > > > I have Batik 1.5.1 (on Windows 2000) and I used the following command to > > create the 'test-batik.png' image: > > "java -jar batik-rasterizer.jar Fire_Station_S2.svg" > > > > Any ideas as to why the quality of the png is so poor using Batik verses > > ImageMagick? I would prefer to use Batik if possible..... > > I am not sure, but I think it is because the circle/ellipse it not true > circle/ellipse. It it made up circle using <path>. Try to set the anti > alias on/off on batik to see the result. > > Regards > Tonny Kohar > -- > Sketsa > SVG Graphics Editor > http://www.kiyut.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
