Hi Thomas,
here I have a little example which I used to test it.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<svg width="843.56" height="595.53" viewBox="0 0 843.56 595.53"
overflow="visible" enable-background="new 0 0 843.56 595.53"
xml:space="preserve">
<g id="Ebene_1" >
<path fill="none" stroke="#FFFFFF" stroke-width="0.25"
stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" d="M40.89,20.68"/>
<rect x="20.33" y="13.43" fill="none" stroke="#FFFFFF"
stroke-width="0.25" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"
width="39.48" height="8.5"/>
<g>
<rect x="0.13" y="0.13" fill="none" stroke="#FFFFFF"
stroke-width="0.25" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"
width="843.31" height="595.28"/>
<rect x="20.47" y="29.56" fill="none" stroke="#000000" width="803.62"
height="515.15"/>
</g>
<line fill="none" stroke="#000000" x1="21.27" y1="173.26" x2="822.27"
y2="173.26"/>
<line fill="none" stroke="#000000" x1="358.27" y1="29.26" x2="358.27"
y2="543.26"/>
</g>
</svg>
Here the command I used to convert it
java -jar batik-rasterizer.jar -a 20,30,804,516 -bg 255.255.255.255
-indexed 2 -w 1680 test.svg
I use the same command in 1.5.1 as in 1.6
The resulting image are different. In 1.6 there is a larger border
on the top and the bottom.
I'll try to test it with the current CVS-Version.
Thomas DeWeese sagte:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> I don't have a direct answer.
>
> Can you please produce a reproducible example? Meaning a
> (hopefully small) SVG file and the command lines to use. Often
> these types of problems are tied to the values of the width/height
> viewBox attributes on the root SVG element. So without SVG content
> it isn't worth trying to track this down.
>
> Also there was a bug fixed since the 1.6 release in
> this area so you could also try CVS if that is convenient.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> we use the Batik rasterizer to transform SVG to PNG.
>>
>> Currently we use Batik 1.5.1. Now I tested the new version but with
>> this version the rasterizer doesn't work in the same way as in 1.5.1
>>
>> With this command
>>
>> java -jar batik-rasterizer.jar -a 20,30,804,516 -bg 255.255.255.255
>> -indexed 2 -w 1680 P:\0321731.svg
>>
>> we can convert the SVG and the given area of interest is in 1.5.1
>> extracted as expected.
>> In 1.6 the result of the command is different from 1.5.1.
>> What has changed in 1.6?
>> Why is resulting area of interest in 1.6. greater than in 1.5.1?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Wolfgang
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
