On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:37:40 +0200 Robert Lummert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Meyer wrote: > > Hello Andreas, > > > > could be wrong... I have seen exports by Adobe Indesign containing > > mutiple "pages" of a Document in an .svgz archive... > > But the official Spec may say something diffrent (if there is any). > > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/ !!! > > at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/struct.html#NewDocument > > > you find > > "An SVG document fragment can stand by itself as a self-contained file > or resource, in which case the SVG document fragment is an SVG > document, or it can be embedded inline as a fragment within a parent > XML document." > > later in this chapter you learn to know that you can embed svg > document fragments into others, but nowhere multiple document > fragments in a singel file are mentioned, though I found it never > forbidden explicitly. > > As AFAIK it is also unclear, if an xml-file in general may contain > multiple root nodes, I would strongly recommend always to have a > single svg-rootnode within a file yourself. If you have to handle > foreign input, maybe vertically putting one after another or tabbing > maybe an option, if you can or want to only display one graphic, the > last one should be displayed according to streaming logic. The XML recommendation has always stated that only one root element is allowed in a well-formed XML document. See the reference to the latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#sec-well-formed G. Wade -- Ever wonder why the SAME PEOPLE make up ALL the conspiracy theories? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
