Hi Kirill, that’s exactly what I was thinking, especially given that this is a hi-res 4K monitor.
I had Windows display settings to scale 150% but when I put it to 100% I found that the issues went away (albeit that it’s almost impossible to read icon text etc.). So, is there anything that can be done about this at the Java level or the Batik level? Maybe some command line arguments to handle the hi-DPI scaling? Graciously, John-Val ________________________________ From: Kirill Grouchnikov <kirill.grouchni...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 7:39:16 AM To: batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org <batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org> Subject: Re: Performance and rendering quality degradation between Batik Squiggle 1.9 and 1.11 Maybe it the high-DPI support added to Java in one of the newer releases, and some kind of legacy fallback for apps that don't opt into something? On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 4:02 PM John-Val Rose <john@rosethorn.technology> wrote: OK, after a bit more digging, I stand corrected. There doesn’t appear to be any of the aforementioned degradations in Batik itself; the issue is with which version of Java you run Squiggle with. I have found that all Java versions after JDK 8 show this slower scaling and poorer rendering quality. Even just the splash screen is very noticeably more pixelated and SVGs themselves are more grainy. I’ve attached some screenshots of both the splash screen and the tiger SVG using Java 8 versus Java 10. Does anyone know why this is the way it is? Graciously, John-Val From: Helder Magalhães<mailto:helder.magalh...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, 17 August 2019 21:36 To: batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org<mailto:batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org> Subject: Re: Performance and rendering quality degradation between Batik Squiggle 1.9 and 1.11 Hi John, Could you elaborate a bit on the comparison? 1. Is it between the same Operating System? And same OS version? Please state which one/ones are they. 2. Is it between the same JRE/JDK (Oracle/OpenJDK/etc.)? And same versions? Please state which one/ones are they. Also, given it's a quality difference, one or two pairs of screenshots between same content in the two environments would quite improve the explanation. Regards, Helder Magalhães A Sáb, 17/08/2019, 06:54, John-Val Rose <john@rosethorn.technology> escreveu: Does anyone know why there appears to be a noticeable degradation in both rendering/scaling performance and also in rendering quality of SVGs in Squiggle between Batik 1.9 and 1.11? What are the major changes that may have resulted in this degradation? Graciously, John-Val --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org<mailto:batik-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org<mailto:batik-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
