Maybe something from here - https://news.kynosarges.org/2019/03/24/swing-high-dpi-properties/
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019, 17:45 John-Val Rose <john@rosethorn.technology> wrote: > Hi Kirill, that’s exactly what I was thinking, especially given that this > is a hi-res 4K monitor. > > > > I had Windows display settings to scale 150% but when I put it to 100% I > found that the issues went away (albeit that it’s almost impossible to read > icon text etc.). > > > > So, is there anything that can be done about this at the Java level or the > Batik level? Maybe some command line arguments to handle the hi-DPI > scaling? > > > > Graciously, > > > > John-Val > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Kirill Grouchnikov <kirill.grouchni...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, August 18, 2019 7:39:16 AM > *To:* batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org < > batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org> > *Subject:* Re: Performance and rendering quality degradation between > Batik Squiggle 1.9 and 1.11 > > Maybe it the high-DPI support added to Java in one of the newer releases, > and some kind of legacy fallback for apps that don't opt into something? > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 4:02 PM John-Val Rose <john@rosethorn.technology> > wrote: > >> OK, after a bit more digging, I stand corrected. >> >> >> >> There doesn’t appear to be any of the aforementioned degradations in >> Batik itself; the issue is with which version of Java you run Squiggle with. >> >> >> >> I have found that all Java versions after JDK 8 show this slower scaling >> and poorer rendering quality. Even just the splash screen is very >> noticeably more pixelated and SVGs themselves are more grainy. >> >> >> >> I’ve attached some screenshots of both the splash screen and the tiger >> SVG using Java 8 versus Java 10. >> >> >> >> Does anyone know why this is the way it is? >> >> >> >> Graciously, >> >> >> >> John-Val >> >> >> >> *From: *Helder Magalhães <helder.magalh...@gmail.com> >> *Sent: *Saturday, 17 August 2019 21:36 >> *To: *batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> *Subject: *Re: Performance and rendering quality degradation between >> Batik Squiggle 1.9 and 1.11 >> >> >> >> Hi John, >> >> >> >> Could you elaborate a bit on the comparison? >> >> 1. Is it between the same Operating System? And same OS version? Please >> state which one/ones are they. >> >> 2. Is it between the same JRE/JDK (Oracle/OpenJDK/etc.)? And same >> versions? Please state which one/ones are they. >> >> >> >> Also, given it's a quality difference, one or two pairs of screenshots >> between same content in the two environments would quite improve the >> explanation. >> >> >> Regards, >> Helder Magalhães >> >> >> >> A Sáb, 17/08/2019, 06:54, John-Val Rose <john@rosethorn.technology> >> escreveu: >> >> Does anyone know why there appears to be a noticeable degradation in both >> rendering/scaling performance and also in rendering quality of SVGs in >> Squiggle between Batik 1.9 and 1.11? >> >> >> >> What are the major changes that may have resulted in this degradation? >> >> >> >> Graciously, >> >> >> >> John-Val >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > >
