"Bryan O'Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jsnx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you see LLVM in GHC's future? > > No. GHC already has a suitable close-to-the-machine intermediate > representation called Cmm (closely related to C--).
Yeah, I guess LLVM is not really going to get you universal binaries -- how do you abstract away the native FS, for example? So there's no compelling reason to switch to it for Haskell applications. -- _jsn --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to "Bay Area Functional Programmers" To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bayfp?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
